HOME BIOGRAPHY ARCHIVES PHOTOS ART

Archive for January, 2009

Israel Today: That’s Apartheid!

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

Everybody sing, to the tune of That’s Amore:

    When your own house is seized and they won’t let you leave
    That’s apartheid
    When you can’t get to work, stopped by gun-toting jerks
    That’s apartheid
    When they sleep in your bed, fill your neighbor with lead
    That’s apartheid
    When the law simply states you’re a second-class race,
    That’s apartheid!

Bob Simon of 60 Minutes offers a long-overdue, eye-opening, unbiased explanation of the current state of the Israel/Palestine situation. He also deduces the future: due to continued construction of illegal Jewish-only settlements in Gaza, there are now only three logical paths to the resolution of the conflict:

Demographers predict that within ten years Arabs will outnumber Jews in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza. Without a separate Palestinian state the Israelis would have three options, none of them good. They could try ethnic cleansing, drive the Palestinians out of the West Bank, or they could give the Palestinians the vote. That would be the democratic option but it would mean the end of the Jewish state. Or they could try apartheid - have the minority Israelis rule the majority Palestinians, but apartheid regimes don’t have a very long life.

Which of the three paths will the conflict take? After watching this CBS report, it’s apparent the Israelis have already taken the path of apartheid.

Watch embedded below, or click this link: 60 Minutes: Is Peace Out of Reach.

Fixing America’s Education Deficit

Monday, January 26th, 2009

EducationThere’s a simple reason American school students get their pants spanked by kids from nearly every other industrialized nation. The answer can be summarized in three words, and everybody should know The Answer by now.

So, why isn’t The Answer mentioned more?

Maybe because most Americans reject the foul and loathsome answer on so many gut-wrenching levels that they simply refuse to state it.

America Rejects Education Improvement

Many reject The Answer to the education problem due to a stubborn resistance to change.

Others reject The Answer in favor of a belief in personal irresponsibility while alluding to the largely disproven theory that an adult’s intelligence is bestowed at birth. (Many Americans from this camp also believe that, even though they themselves graduated dumber than most foreign graduates, as soon as the diplomas were handed out, the intelligence fairy waved her wand and made them the smartest adults in the world; this lack of rational thinking, in itself, is witness to the inferior American education experience.)

Still others reject The Answer due to sentimental tradition — a tradition they pass on and hang about their children’s necks like so many millstones.

Maybe most of all, Americans reject The Answer because The Answer involves sacrifice. Unlike some generations of Americans, today’s parents seem to want a fairytale answer that gifts their children knowledge for little or nothing.

Despite the increasing swell of earnest middleclass wishing, the fairytale answer doesn’t exist. Consequently, this year the American Class of 2009 will graduate far from the top of the global classroom with their futures heavily curtailed by their parents’ inability to face reality.

So, what is The Answer?

The Answer is so genuinely disgusting and ugly that you may be shocked. Before going there, it’s important to admit that the American school system has a big problem. So, let’s look at reality, and also look at the terrible reality we’re going to face if we don’t fix America’s educational system…

America’s Outclassed Education System

It’s no secret that when compared with students from other industrialized nations, American school students come up way short. Waaaaay short.

For example, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) tests and compares 15-year-old schoolchildren’s performance across the world. In the 2006 PISA results, American school students didn’t place in the top 20 in Mathematics. They didn’t place in the top 20 in science or reading, either. Kids from Taiwan, Finland, and South Korea scored better than American students. That may be tough to swallow, but even tougher is the fact that American students were also left in the dust by their peers from Liechtenstein, Macau, Estonia, Slovenia…the list goes on and on.

In another study, the 2007 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), U.S. students cracked the top 10 by coming in 9th in Math, but they only came in 12th in science — not what you’d expect from the wealthiest nation in the world.

Which countries have smarter students? Japan, Korea, Russia…

The Plight of Outclassed Americans

So, what’s the big deal? Nothing, really, if Americans aren’t concerned about holding their own in the future.

As made evident by the popular Did You Know 2.0 and Did You Know 3.0 videos by Karl Fisch and Scott Mcleod, the future is now. For example, let’s compare the number of 2006 college graduates:

2006CollegeGraduates

Does that make you a little nervous? The video also points out a few other facts:

  • 100% of those 2006 Indian graduates speak English.
  • China will soon become the number one English speaking country in the world.
  • The 25% of India’s population with the highest IQs…is greater than the total population of the United States (India has more honors kids than America has kids.)

THAT’s the world the American school system should be preparing our children to live in.

Ways to Fix American Schools

While avoiding The Answer, Americans have suggested a number of ways that might fix the outclassed American education experience.

One suggestion is free preschool for everybody. This isn’t a bad idea, and isn’t without merit. However, it doesn’t fix the big problem, because according to international testing results, American first graders are on a par with the brightest kids around the world. It’s after entering first grade that they begin falling behind.

Another suggestion is to throw more money at the problem. This idea doesn’t have much merit either, because some of the top-ranked countries spend far less per student on education.

Maybe we should have better teachers? Better teachers would definitely be a plus, but other countries have their own share of mediocre teachers. It’s just not The Answer.

What about more school days?

What if, instead of squeezing an introduction to integral calculus into a single school week (and having the students who didn’t “get it” feel lost for the rest of the semester…), the lesson was spread out over three weeks, and the teacher had plenty of time to make sure each student had a firm grasp on that foundation before moving ahead and building on it?

Bingo!

Practice Makes Perfect

Hypothetical question: Two athletes of equal ability prepare for a race. Over the course of three months, one athlete trains with her coach for 15 hours a week; the other athlete trains with the same coach for 20 hours a week. Which athlete would you put your money on, the one with 45 hours of coaching or the one with 60 hours?

Better yet, what if the same two athletes followed their unequal training schedules for 12 years?

I’ll tell you what would happen: The athlete that had 3,120 more hours of coached training would leave the less-trained athlete in the dust.

The Answer: More School Days

The Answer is ugly and despised, but it’s the not-so-pretty truth: Most American school students attend classes 180 days each year. Most students in India, China, South Korea, and Japan attend school 220-240 days per year. Do the math. Why is it such a big surprise that those foreign students are leaving American students in the dust?

Yes, those 240 days include some Saturdays. And yes, their school days are longer than American school days. And yes, they don’t get three months off for summer vacation.

Do the foreign students like having to attend class 240 days out of the year? Of course not. I’m sure many would rather be working a summer job at a fast food restaurant and earning money to buy a cool outfit or an Xbox 360, or hanging out at the swimming pool, or playing summer sports like their American peers.

Funny how some Americans think it’s fine for the kid who spends the most time and effort on the field to earn a first-string spot on the football squad. And yet, many of those same parents believe their kids should be able to spend less time and effort in the classroom than their foreign peers, and yet still earn a first-string job in the global economy.

Think about this: China now produces eight times more scientists and engineers than the U.S., and India produces three times as many. As a result, more and more multinational high-tech corporations are choosing to set up shop in those countries instead of the United States, because the kids in those countries put in the hours, and the sweat, and they earned it.

With 60 more school days per year, foreign students leave high school with a total of 720 more days of classroom time than American students. That’s the equivalent of an extra 4 years in the 180-day American school system.

Say what you will about the quality of time in class, or the ability of the teachers to educate. It would take a fantastic improvement in average teaching ability to make up a four year deficit in class time.

Still refusing logic, some argue that less days in school means American children, though not as book smart, will leave school more well-rounded than the foreign students with the higher test scores. But by the same argument, hundreds of millions of third-world citizens are more well-rounded than products of our American educational system.

If a well-rounded third-world type of life is what we Americans set our sights on, that’s what we’ll likely achieve.

A New Day in America

Monday, January 19th, 2009

A New Day in AmericaThe stage is set, and the band is ready to play, and a new day in America is almost here…unless it turns out to be like so many other presidential inauguration days when promises were made and flags were waved but what was really going on was a nation fooling itself and making a lot of noise as an excuse to turn her eyes away from the tired, poor, huddled masses she was treading on.

But, America has accomplished great things, too, and if her indifferent citizens can steer the ship off course so quickly, so too can the same malcontent population right the ship with dizzying speed. Maybe the greatest thing about America is that people here can be flexible, and while flexibility has been scarce in the past few years, it seems to have returned in recent months.

Things are changing for sure. Will things change enough? Maybe; maybe not. But one thing I have noticed as the new administration is taking over: there’s a new emphasis on treating others with dignity and respect, and a belief that those who do most of the work should get rewarded with at least a little hint of a proportionate degree of our nation’s collective wealth. So far, it is nice to hear a shift in the propaganda toward a litany of fairness and reason and kindness instead of uninspired fear mongering.

Today, I’m proud to be an American, and at the same time humbled to be so lucky to have been born here. And until the new administration betrays its promises, I’m fine with putting a little faith in it, with the understanding that trust can’t be rebuilt overnight but has to be earned. And somehow, I think this administration gets that and understands that. And I think this administration also realizes that most Americans don’t mind contributing and making sacrifices — but only when their leader stops repeatedly commanding them to piss into the wind. Cheers to that new day!

JoeC Interviews Himself, Part 1

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

I’m really not that great of an interviewer, so, like, I pilfered/purloined/swiped some questions from CanTeach.com. Off I go…

What would happen if everyone wore the same clothes?

That question truly needs more clarification. If we’re talking about one single outfit, I think it would be a very impractical proposition. The logistics would be a nightmare. We’re talking about an outfit, assuming it’s modeled after what I’m wearing now and the current population, you know…it’d have to be a shirt with 13.4 billion sleeves, and a pair of pants with a near amount of legs (but not exactly; due to recent wars and collateral damage, the number of arms in the world has diverged drastically from the number of legs.)

Back to your question: I think the first decision has to be skirt? Or pants?

Honestly, most females in the Muslim cultures would refuse wearing pants, and I know some Christian men would refuse to wear a skirt, so there’s your impasse. Also consider the diaper-or-no-diaper infant problem, the transatlantic hemline problem, and the Britney-stood-too-close-to-the-candles-and-caught-our-global-shirt-on-wildfire problem.

But, hey, if you still think it’s possible for everybody to wear the same pair of clothes, think about this: during American winter, our collective outfit needs to be thicker in the Northern hemisphere, and thinner in Australia. Vice-versa for American summer. Major advances in nanotechnology will be required, and possibly some breakthroughs in quantum physics — like a good portion of the waking world will probably have to go to work wearing nothing more than clothing probabilities most days.

On the other hand, if by “everyone wore the same clothes” you mean there’s one shirt and one pair of pants between all 6.8 billion of us…that’s just not going to fly either. Even on a much smaller scale, like getting everybody in Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip to share the same shirt and pair of pants — that’s not going to work in 2009. Even on a much, much, much smaller scale, like getting my wife and me to share one single outfit…you know what? Some folks say there are no stupid questions, but you just asked a really stupid question. Congratulations, wiseacre. Next…

Why do you think some people take advantage of others?

Because they were made in God’s image (Genesis 1:26-27). Or maybe they just get a kick out of taking things out of context and seeing how far they can twist it.

Or maybe they are fulfilling their role as teachers of great courage and wisdom to the weak and naive.

Or maybe they’re playing Monopoly and that’s the way the maker intended the game be played.

Or maybe they’re scared and desperate and out of options.

Or maybe they have low self-esteem and need a pick-me-up.

Or maybe they’re ignorant, ill-bred clotpoles. Yeah, I think it’s a little bit of all of those.

Do you think it is necessary to have alcohol at a party in order to have a good time?

Well, yeah. I mean, even if 80-something-year-old non-dead Elvis came out of hiding and showed up, or if Marilyn Monroe came out of a time-machine that didn’t transport clothing, or if President Bush walked in with the nukular football and said: “Better late than never…we’ve got every silo and sub aimed at Moscow, and we’re gonna launch ‘em all from your living room. Giddyup!”, even then, it would be a pretty piss-poor party without some jello shooters to loosen up the mood. Ok, maybe if Clint Eastwood and Jack Nicholson were in the room playing Guitar Hero and telling back-in-the-day stories…I guess alcohol wouldn’t be necessary then. But seriously, how the heck are you going to get Nicholson to show up without a kegger?

What would happen if you could fly whenever you wanted? When would you use this ability?

Duhhhhh…like, whenever I wanted. I always thought it would be cool to fly, but only if it was like a Superman levitation thing. If it was like a bee sort of thing where you have to beat your arms a zillion times a second, it just wouldn’t seem that cool anymore, but I still probably wouldn’t turn it down.

What about life do you find extremely hard?

You know what’s hard? I want to give back. I want to do all the things that will make me feel fulfilled. But whenever I do those things, people think it’s a press stunt or something and — !@#$! help me, I just lifted/hooked/filched this answer from a Lindsay Lohan interview. Please, please help me extend her 15 minutes, no matter how hard she pretends to chase privacy :-)

Garage Sales for Gaza

Saturday, January 10th, 2009

Xman has just put up a new blog: Garage Sales for Gaza:

I have never done anything more than vacillate between the political points I have seen made on the news. I didn’t know what or who to believe. I have never taken action to help either side.
Well, those days are over!
I will help those who are being isolated, imprisoned, bombed, strafed and totally destroyed.
Whatever the two sides have been doing all my life, it hasn’t worked.
It is time to try something new.

Some might think I’m being cynical when I say: “Good luck saving the world.” But I’m not. If anybody can make a difference and get a ball of good will rolling, I believe Xman can.

Read More: