Comments on: The Trouble with WTC Asbestos http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-trouble-with-wtc-asbestos/ A dissident twist of reality... Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:50:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Paul Firth http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-trouble-with-wtc-asbestos/comment-page-1/#comment-43061 Paul Firth Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:20:57 +0000 http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-trouble-with-wtc-asbestos/#comment-43061 Why don’t all the people of New York and the people that had lost relatives and those who are now suffering as a result of 911 sue the man who owned the complex? He knew what he was doing acquiring the complex as did the man who leased it to him, as Silverstein was the lowest bidder but the man in charge of the Port Authority is also a Jew like Silverstein. During his 6 week ownership he had the sense to insure against terrorist attacks at a cost of 15 million dollars, it made him 4 billion dollars richer how convenient? I read the following piece about the Port Authority and its proposals; it’s taken from Silverstein Makes a Huge Profit off of the 9/11 Attacks: It was well-known by the city of New York that the WTC was an asbestos bombshell. For years, the Port Authority treated the building like an aging dinosaur, attempting on several occasions to get permits to demolish the building for liability reasons, but being turned down due the known asbestos problem. Further, it was well-known the only reason the building was still standing until 9/11 was because it was too costly to disassemble the twin towers floor by floor since the Port Authority was prohibited legally from demolishing the buildings. [Arctic Beacon] But as Dimitri Khalezov Book Third Truth 911 and movie, which the US government is desperately try to force all the websites that have the movie to download to delete from their sites or shut them down. As he says that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition, which is the most possible result yet from all the films I’ve got concerning 911. I have 60GB of films concerning 911 and I believe that the US government was responsible and I also believe that Silverstein was behind it. He didn’t give a dam about the people who lost their lives or the families involved, he was only thinking about how much profit he would make. Why they didn’t charge him with arson is beyond belief, but his friends in high places would have taken care of that; another movie worth watching is called “Missing Links”. He’s one of the biggest Israeli mafia bandits in the US today and he has a great many Jewish friends in high places in the US government. Regards Paul. P.S. Please excuse any mistakes as I have Motor Neurons’ Disease, and my brain works faster than my hands and I am typing in UK English. Why don’t all the people of New York and the people that had lost relatives and those who are now suffering as a result of 911 sue the man who owned the complex? He knew what he was doing acquiring the complex as did the man who leased it to him, as Silverstein was the lowest bidder but the man in charge of the Port Authority is also a Jew like Silverstein. During his 6 week ownership he had the sense to insure against terrorist attacks at a cost of 15 million dollars, it made him 4 billion dollars richer how convenient? I read the following piece about the Port Authority and its proposals; it’s taken from

Silverstein Makes a Huge Profit off of the 9/11 Attacks:

It was well-known by the city of New York that the WTC was an asbestos bombshell. For years, the Port Authority treated the building like an aging dinosaur, attempting on several occasions to get permits to demolish the building for liability reasons, but being turned down due the known asbestos problem. Further, it was well-known the only reason the building was still standing until 9/11 was because it was too costly to disassemble the twin towers floor by floor since the Port Authority was prohibited legally from demolishing the buildings. [Arctic Beacon]

But as Dimitri Khalezov Book Third Truth 911 and movie, which the US government is desperately try to force all the websites that have the movie to download to delete from their sites or shut them down. As he says that the towers were brought down by nuclear demolition, which is the most possible result yet from all the films I’ve got concerning 911. I have 60GB of films concerning 911 and I believe that the US government was responsible and I also believe that Silverstein was behind it. He didn’t give a dam about the people who lost their lives or the families involved, he was only thinking about how much profit he would make. Why they didn’t charge him with arson is beyond belief, but his friends in high places would have taken care of that; another movie worth watching is called “Missing Links”. He’s one of the biggest Israeli mafia bandits in the US today and he has a great many Jewish friends in high places in the US government.

Regards Paul.

P.S. Please excuse any mistakes as I have Motor Neurons’ Disease, and my brain works faster than my hands and I am typing in UK English.

]]> By: caz http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-trouble-with-wtc-asbestos/comment-page-1/#comment-33968 caz Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:26:42 +0000 http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-trouble-with-wtc-asbestos/#comment-33968 Speaking of "spray-on" fire proofing material, there is likely a connection to NIST. Rather than me trying to spell it out, best to google "The Top 10 Connections between NIST and Nano thermite" by Kevin Ryan. Never mind the knee-jerk responses to this, just read the article and draw your own conclusions. :) Speaking of “spray-on” fire proofing material, there is likely a connection to NIST. Rather than me trying to spell it out, best to google “The Top 10 Connections between NIST and Nano thermite” by Kevin Ryan. Never mind the knee-jerk responses to this, just read the article and draw your own conclusions. :)

]]> By: Xman http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-trouble-with-wtc-asbestos/comment-page-1/#comment-33236 Xman Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:30:09 +0000 http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-trouble-with-wtc-asbestos/#comment-33236 Roger, that! Roger, that!

]]> By: Indigobusiness http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-trouble-with-wtc-asbestos/comment-page-1/#comment-33235 Indigobusiness Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:50:04 +0000 http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-trouble-with-wtc-asbestos/#comment-33235 Mira Sorvino is not bad consolation. Mira Sorvino is not bad consolation.

]]> By: Xman http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-trouble-with-wtc-asbestos/comment-page-1/#comment-33233 Xman Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:49:10 +0000 http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-trouble-with-wtc-asbestos/#comment-33233 Indigo, I agree. It also seems to be going more fascist. Last night the girl next door shoveling snow woke me up. For the next hour I made a list of all the negative things about human society(including her thoughtlessness). Feeling that bad triggered the need to make a list of all the good that would hopefully balance it. I came up short...and when I did the same thing to the entire history of mankind, I knew I'd never get to sleep. So I got up, ate big chocolate chip cookies and milk and watched Jet Lee and Mira Sorvino kill a bunch of bad guys. Indigo,
I agree. It also seems to be going more fascist.
Last night the girl next door shoveling snow woke me up. For the next hour I made a list of all the negative things about human society(including her thoughtlessness). Feeling that bad triggered the need to make a list of all the good that would hopefully balance it. I came up short…and when I did the same thing to the entire history of mankind, I knew I’d never get to sleep. So I got up, ate big chocolate chip cookies and milk and watched Jet Lee and Mira Sorvino kill a bunch of bad guys.

]]>