The Coming North American Union
There are no problems, only solutions. And, for the elite members of the Council on Foreign Relations who are steadily herding us toward a one world government, the illegal immigration problem is a desired and necessary occurrence. You can see things from their viewpoint, too, once you are shown the big picture. (Step back from the chalkboard, because the big picture is…well, it’s big.)
The stage is being set to dissolve the U.S. border in order to form a more perfect North American Union between the United States, Mexico, and Canada.
You’ve seen it happen with the European Union. Next step, North American Union. And someday, the European Union and North American Union will join the South American Union, Asian Union, and African Union to become the World Union, also known as the New World Order.
But let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
Hard Work Combining Countries
Right now, hard work is going on — has been quietly going on for some time — between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The three countries are busy coordinating and aligning import and export laws and procedures. Then…soon…America’s borders will be dissolved.
Yes, there will still be a welcome sign there, and a line across the highway…just like there’s still a sign at the border between North and South Carolina. But, in reality, our home is now their home, and their home will be ours.
So, you see, the Bush administration actually needs the current flow of immigrants, because, despite how uncomfortable a strong migration feels, it’s actually much less destructive than the wave of immigrants we’d see if airtight borders were dismantled all at once.
And the borders ARE going to be dismantled…
Americans in the Dark
You haven’t heard? Oh, you must live in America, behind the Cotton Candy Curtain erected by our corporate-owned media. The American Not-So-Free Press has been told to keep this story quiet. Because, when Americans all realise that the gold-based, then oil-based, now nothing-based almighty dollar will soon be printed like there’s no tomorrow, they’ll panic. Well, at first they’ll be happy because minimum wage will go up, and more people than ever will get huge raises, and earn hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, and everybody will be so happy to finally become a millionaire that they won’t realise their life savings only buys a couple bags of potatoes.
But don’t take my word for it. Click on the video below:
So, just how severe will the coming dollar collapse be?
Severe enough to get the dirty work done. Bob Chapman, publisher of the International Forecaster, says:
People in the U.S. are going to be hit hard. In the severe recession we are entering now, Bush will argue that we have to form a North American Union to compete with the Euro. Creating the amero will be presented to the American public as the administration’s solution for dollar recovery. In the process of creating the amero, the Bush administration just abandons the dollar.
Of course the Bush administration denies that any big changes are up his sleeve, but Tom DeWeese tells us why Bush is, once again, lying:
Now, in offices buried in the bureaucratic structures of the United States, Canada and Mexico, twenty “working groups” are hard at work writing policy initiatives…covering a wide range of issues including, the manufacture and movement of goods across the borders of the three North American nations; creating a common energy policy and common environmental regulations over the three nations; regulating E-commerce and information communications and technologies; establishing financial services, including loan policy and foreign aid policy; overseeing business facilitation, creating the rules under which businesses will operate in the three nations; establishing food and agriculture policy; and overseeing transportation and health policy.
These policy directives will infringe on every aspect of our lives. Can anyone seriously accept the Administration’s explanation that nothing really important is going on here?
And that’s not even mentioning the NAFTA Superhighway. Texas Congressman Ron Paul describes the new construction that will soon be running through his state:
The ultimate goal is not simply a superhighway, but an integrated North American Union–complete with a currency, a cross-national bureaucracy, and virtually borderless travel within the Union. Like the European Union, a North American Union would represent another step toward the abolition of national sovereignty altogether.
Meanwhile, the Congress has woken up enough to add an amendment to prohibit the use of federal funds for participating in North American Union work groups, including the creation of NAFTA superhighways. The amendment was added recently to H.R. 3074, the Transportation Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2008, and passed on a 362-63 vote.
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries.” ~David Rockefeller address to Trilateral Commission meeting, June 1991.
Read More: new world order, North American Union, George W. Bush
Related Articles
I Like the idea of having open borders. Not the idea of spending my life savings on a bag of potatoes. I would think beef jerky would hold us a little longer, although it stinks to high heaven. I don’t understand where this theory comes from though, because I thought we had decided to build fences to keep our neighbors out.
Last October, Bush signed off on the fence, and it gives $1.2 billion to the Department of Homeland Security, but doesn’t specify that it’s specifically for the fence. (more about the fence here: Mexico barrier)
A lot of people think the fence is just a public relations ploy to pacify the people who want to lock down the borders while really not doing much to stem the flow of illegal aliens. However there ARE Congressmen who really do want the fence, and are proceeding…slowly (Congressman Hunter’s web page about the fence progress).
But aliens continue to migrate in massive numbers and the fence probably won’t stop it, or even be complete by the time borders between Mexico and Canada are relaxed. Then we can pay contractors to disassemble the border we paid them to construct — sort of the reverse of Iraq where we are paying contractors to reconstruct buildings we disassembled (with bombs).
Crap, Joe, I’m just going to stop blogging and point to your site! :)
What are all the issues involved with this? How have European countries fared since they went to the Euro? Do we need to just forget about our Constitution in light of this? I have a lot of questions about this but I’m sure that in the end, it is a move to protect the elite from the rest of us unwashed masses.
Why is it only Lou Dobbs is the only one who has spoken up on this issue? None of our other media has even touched on it. And why is it all being done in secret behind closed doors? If it will be so good for us, why are they so clandestine about it.
We are in a gigantic spiral downwards, when Clinton’s cleavage and Edward’s hair are top topics during a presidential campaign, and things such as this aren’t even mentioned.
Since you oppose globalism and trans-national alliances and the dissolution of borders, please demonstrate how Nationalism has improved the world.
Yeah, Lou Dobbs is talking about it but I think that’s about it for the MSM.
It is very important at all times to daw a distinction between the NAU and the European Union.
First off, those nations are roughly the same size .. whereas in this little equation the US Is 10 times the size of Poland .. whoops! I mean Canada. This need for future resources for all these US mouths to feed would be cause for alarm … and this hidden greed is what makes people want to see it get through. They want Canadian fresh water, of which Canada has 20% of the world’s reserves …
But secondly, there were no entrenched wars going on at the time of the EU. The DoD will be the PRIMARY beneficiary of this “plan”/”protocol”.
This trilateral commission PLAN had been YEARS in the making .. the 9/11 synthetic teror event gave the impetus to cram this through a real basis as people became SO terrified they wanted Uncle Sam to help them out. This underhanded truly elistist strategy to control oil and other resources but also control MINDS, which they are doing rather splendidly well these days. All the secrecy just plays on people’s further fears ..
So why would Canada and Mexico play along …?, knowing fully well this is no EU type of deal … and knowing that guaranteeing OIL would benefit ONLY the US Department of Defense which is protecting the Texas oil boyz and their allies …? Well, they (the cabal and the oil cartel) have all the intelligence about what world resources will be likely to “Be” needed thorugh 2025, as they control INTELLIGENCE. WOW! And they have all the resources to keep finding out what they are …
So, no this is no European Union deal . . this is US strategic interests being crammed down people’s throats by two unelected [sic] Presidents and was inked by an Prime Minister who was a lame duck from Day One (Paul Martin), himself a shipping magnate. Hmmmmmmm. And now it is endorsed by a Prime Minister who got his campaign funds from Alberta tar sands investors, who are .. guess! .. the oil majors, transnationals NOT Canadians.
People are shouting TREASON! up here . .. but it’s worse than that … the lowered environmental standards to keep competitiveness working could destroy us all in very short order.
I keep reading all these posts about the end of democracy . and consistently they seem to miss the biggest detail .. the sense of ENTITLEMENT of the Rockefellers, the Bushes, the politicos, the corporate “leaders”, esp. the Competitiveness Council members of whom there are but 30 .. all have. These resources that they think that they are entitled to actually belong to First Nations people.
One last point: many “illegals” are actually misplaced indigenous peoples from Mexico, who the US war machine and its corporate allies displaced. Where do people expect them to go to find a way to eat …? OR are they supposed to eat grass as many did during the glory days of the old West? No, they are supposed to get choked on dirty water and nuclear pollution, I guess ….
Hey, follks, your landlord is stealing YOUR apartment!
Great article, btw!
Virginia
Lynne: I’ve got a lot of questions, too. It’s not necessarily a bad thing to keep a friendly dialogue with your neighbors, but when you have a track Imperial record like Bush has got going…heck, like AMERICA has going since WWII…then I think suspicion is more than justified.
Pelmo: Lou Dobbs has been pretty livid over this. That may be because he “gets” it. It SHOULD make us all livid that this is being done so quietly, and without our voting on it. Are we being represented? Hell no.
Shane: I don’t oppose globalism or trans-national alliances, and I think Nationalism is a bad thing too. What I mean to say is that all of these things in balance is a good thing, but any one run amok is bad. If you asked why I’m against a one-world economy/government, I would point out two reasons: One, the 1997 Asian financial crisis, mostly limited to Asia, but if this happened with a one-world economy EVERYBODY would be affected at the same time. Two, Hitler. When Hitler came to power in the 1930s, there were other independent nations to check him. If a one-world government rises, and another dictator like Hitler gets control they would be much harder to remove from power.
James: it is VERY quiet out there…they’ve really thrown a thick blanket over this one.
Virginia: Thanks for the analysis…this IS very definitely different than the EU, and yet I seem to remember the EU was also quietly planned long before most of the public was aware of the road they were headed down.
It’s all about “order”. George #1’s New World Order or the Nazi’s New Order.
The masses are nothing but a herd of cows that the elite are trying to control so they can be milked with as little fuss as possible.
Take $10 - 15k in taxes from each person each year multiply that by hundreds of millions of taxpayers and you have the scratch for a pretty good reality board game. You get to control the media, the schools, and thus the minds. You get to staff your armies with little zombies that will joyfully run head long into machine guns and you don’t even have to fix them when they break…and don’t have to give them and their families a living wage. You get hire illusionists with someone elses money that gets you even more f their money and their young. You actually get to call the constitution a god-damned piece of paper and the zombies still come and lick your feet…even though they thought defending that piece of paper was what they were programmed to do. They fill the airways with Cotton Candy Fantasies and pump you up until you are obese. They tell us not to look at what they do, but at what they say…and to trust them. “Sorry, we can’t tell you why, but just trust us that we are doing what is needed to protect you and America”. Has it ever been any different?
One the one hand, this seems to me the culmination of Bolivar’s beautiful dream.
On the other hand, the secrecy bothers me a whole lot — and I have to wonder if all of the brouhaha stirred up around illegal immigration isn’t just another way to insure the people are divided once they are united.
And maybe I’m prejudiced, but I intrinsically distrust anything Bush supports.
Joe, you are right that suspicion is justified. I have questions about how it will affect us all and believe that if Bush is for it, it is bad for the rest of us.
Yep, Bush has a pretty good record of predicting what will be bad for America…if he’s for it, it’s bad.
Yep, it’s all part of the NWO plan.
You’re right Joe, if Bush is for it, it can’t be good for America!
Since you are the political writer, would like your opinion on Obama’s speech the other day, where he sounded to much like George W.
His constant references to Al-Quaida, Bin Laden and the invasion of Pakistan. And the old standby we are going to fight them over there.
I think Obama is part of the approved “machine.” Despite what everybody else says, I do like him saying that he would talk to all the leaders in the world…even the leaders from the so-called Axis of Evil. That’s one thing I’ve hated about the Bush administration and past administrations. I mean, growing up, when did our teachers ever teach us to solve our playground disputes by refusing to communicate even if it was only to tell each other face to face why we disagree. But back to Obama, all this talk about Al Qaeda and pursuing terrorists into other countries…I’m like you, I think he’s drinking the AIPAC “we’re the most special people in the world, now kiss our butts and fight who we tell you to fight” Kool-Aid. No nation or race is more special than any other; that’s what I was taught in church growing up, so I don’t want to hear any evangelical BS about why it’s ok for Israel to have the A-bomb and not anybody else in the Middle East, or why it’s ok for Israel to clusterbomb Lebanon. I don’t get it. It’s insane.
Anyway, with all this tough war talk, even if Obama’s only posturing to bring in more conservative voters and doesn’t really mean it, he’s off my list. He may not permanently be off my list…but he’ll have to get my attention again with some better thoughts on foreign policy before I consider him for President again. Right now, for me — and I don’t believe in all their stances, but I believe in their sincerre decoupled-from-corporate-greed visions — my favorites are Kucinich (whose stances most closely match my own, but whose “presidentialness” may be lacking…) and Ron Paul, who I think isn’t as “owned” by the Corporate-Political Octopus and seems to have a logical sound head on his shoulders.
Now, folks will say neither of these candidates have a chance in hell of winning, but being a Mississippi State Bulldog fan, we never have a chance of hell in winning either, but I still cheer for them. And you know what? About once every other season or so, the massively underdog Dawgs beat the pants off of somebody who didn’t take them seriously…so we’ll see what happens ;-)
I would have to agree on those two. A ticket of Kucinich/Paul or Paul/Kucinich might be just the thing to bring this country back on the right track here and abroad. Can you imagine what could be accomplished with two thinkers in the White House at the same time.
An election involving someone with brains, instead of looks and money. What a novel concept.
The Bushco/Nixonian machine has always needed a focus of evil to fuel their fear machine. It isn’t all that complicated.
When Cheney dismissed Osama’s offer of on an olive branch -by way of a truce in one of his communiques- saying we don’t negotiate with terrorists. It was clear that nothing would stop the bloodbath until the warmongers were sated, or driven from power.
There was another offer, by Osama’a 2nd, but that was summarily dismissed as well.
It haunts me to think of the missed possibilties of turning down the heat, reducing the killing and devastation, and where legitimate diplomacy may have led.
It seems we don’t negotiate with terrorists unless we are selling them weapons.
My only question with Obama is that if he was once a Muslim and is now Christrian, isn’t that against Muslim ideals? I thought they killed Muslims that converted. I have never heard a Muslim say anything bad about him, that alone makes me wonder if it’s all part of a plan?
I know that my knowledge on the subject is lacking, just trying to learn.
Diane D: Thanks for stopping by! According to Snope’s Urban Legends page (Obama Barack Urban Legends), Obama was never a Muslim.
He grew up Christian, and has been associated with the United Church of Christ since the 1980s.
The rumor that he was raised a Muslim may have started because during 5 years when he lived with his stepfather in Indonesia, he attended both Catholic and Muslim schools. But, he attended those schools for their academic reputations, not because of their religious affiliations. Sort of like a lot of people in my own city who aren’t Catholic or Baptist but who put their kids in Catholic and Baptist day cares because they offer the best childcare deal for the money.
For me, my big concern about Obama is not that he might be Muslim, but that, like Hillary, he seems all too willing to bomb whichever Muslim country (Iran, Syria, etc…) that Israel tells him needs bombing.
Thank you, Joe. That clears things up for me.
The Jesuit Order is the TRUE power behind the New World Order which in reality is nothing more than the OLD ROMAN EMPIRE in disguise. The Council on Foreign Relations was created by Jesuit puppets who masterminded the proposed “North American Union” scheme.
The Federal Reserve System, another Jesuit puppet creation, is busy continuing the dollar collapse to pave the way for the “Amero”, the Euro style debt/usury/fiat currency for that North American Union.
When do you think the Feds will implement the Amero currency?
Do you think the Amero will be just as worthless as the current dollar? Do you think things will be far worse if they do bring in the Amero?
What things can we expect to see (economy, society, housing, food, energy, foreign relations ect..) when they do bring in the Amero?
If I were you I would start buying gold and silver coins which I am.
Because those coins will be worth more than the dollar and the Amero.
Dan: Who knows how long it will take, but the bricks are clearly being set in place. I don’t think the Amero will be as worthless as the dollar, but will be a lot more stable, and thus, getting the dollar to spiral will be how they get everybody to willingly shift their financial holdings from the dollars to the stable Ameros.
As for Gold and silver…remember, Roosevelt confiscated all gold holdings in 1933, and there are laws on the books that allow the government to confiscate your gold during an economic crisis or time of war, and we’re likely to be experiencing both. Just look at all the other things Bush has done under pretext of “war on terror” and it’s not hard to imagine he’d recall everybody’s gold…and if you think the government will exchange a fair amount of dollars or Ameros for your gold, you’re nuts.
Here’s a little info on the U.S. Government’s right to confiscate your gold: link.
[...] More and more, this sounds like a fine idea. And don’t worry too much, because this was the plan all along. As soon as everybody’s hungry enough, Bush will replace the dollar with the Amero, and we can be united with Canada and Mexico in the coming North American Union. [...]