Comments on: The September 11, 2001 Attacks http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2007/02/28/the-september-11-2001-attacks/ A dissident twist of reality... Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:32:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Xman http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2007/02/28/the-september-11-2001-attacks/#comment-32882 Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:28:31 +0000 http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2007/02/28/the-september-11-2001-attacks/#comment-32882 Copy that! Copy that!

]]> by: JoeC http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2007/02/28/the-september-11-2001-attacks/#comment-32863 Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:47:48 +0000 http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2007/02/28/the-september-11-2001-attacks/#comment-32863 The first 15 minutes looks like a good presentation. 9/11 reminds me of the Kennedy assassination, in that even after there is all kinds of proof that Oswald did not act alone, somehow the myth lives on as the "correct" version of events. Unlike the Kennedy assassination, the "correct" version of 9/11 is different outside the USA, and most people inside the USA don't realize that outside the USA consensus is now a no-brainer that the US Government was complicit in the attacks that day. You know this, I know this, and most rational people who are willing to look at the evidence with an open mind know this. But, even in Columbus' day when most intelligent people really knew the earth was round, there were those that would refuse to watch sails rise above the horizon as they drew closer to port...it took generations for the myth of a flat earth to die, and it will take generations for the "Osama 9/11" myth to be realized as such in American textbooks. By then, the empire will have either turned the US into a police state or set up camp in another country, I fear... The first 15 minutes looks like a good presentation. 9/11 reminds me of the Kennedy assassination, in that even after there is all kinds of proof that Oswald did not act alone, somehow the myth lives on as the “correct” version of events. Unlike the Kennedy assassination, the “correct” version of 9/11 is different outside the USA, and most people inside the USA don’t realize that outside the USA consensus is now a no-brainer that the US Government was complicit in the attacks that day. You know this, I know this, and most rational people who are willing to look at the evidence with an open mind know this. But, even in Columbus’ day when most intelligent people really knew the earth was round, there were those that would refuse to watch sails rise above the horizon as they drew closer to port…it took generations for the myth of a flat earth to die, and it will take generations for the “Osama 9/11″ myth to be realized as such in American textbooks. By then, the empire will have either turned the US into a police state or set up camp in another country, I fear…

]]> by: Xman http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2007/02/28/the-september-11-2001-attacks/#comment-32862 Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:06:44 +0000 http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2007/02/28/the-september-11-2001-attacks/#comment-32862 Hey Joe, I know you are busy, but do you know about the latest 911 movie? USA networks won't show it. Made by Italians. I found a link on "russia today". Name of the movie is "Zero". They show you the first 15 minutes on their site. http://zero911movie.com/site/ Hey Joe,
I know you are busy, but do you know about the latest 911 movie?
USA networks won’t show it. Made by Italians. I found a link on “russia today”.

Name of the movie is “Zero”. They show you the first 15 minutes on their site.

http://zero911movie.com/site/

]]> by: arman http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2007/02/28/the-september-11-2001-attacks/#comment-32854 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:15:04 +0000 http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2007/02/28/the-september-11-2001-attacks/#comment-32854 fact: in his book the Iconic Building, world renouned Architecture & landscape theorist Charles Jencks has mentioned in his forward that Larry Silverstien had comissioned SOM to design the WTC well before 9/11! why would a company like SOM design the twin towers when it was still standing? & why would a world renouned accademic put his credentials on line if this was not a fact? I am an architect with practice knowledge in structure. I humbly say it is an insult to my profession when we have witnessed that when the towers were collapsing and that not one set of columns or cores resisted the fall and allow the tower to fall in large segments instead of absolute uniform implosion! it is a clear sign of detonation. btw, plz realize countless countless countless of innocent lives has been lost and others are suffering miserably right at this moment becuase of this fake war on terror and to provide contracts to private military companies owned by the influential few. is this the best the free world has to offer? is this what the leader of the free world america has to offer. Then we don't have a chance. Looks like the nazi or the soviets were a better deal ... think about it america. if you don't stand up to the truth, it will be time when power will shift to a more just nation. fact: in his book the Iconic Building, world renouned Architecture & landscape theorist Charles Jencks has mentioned in his forward that Larry Silverstien had comissioned SOM to design the WTC well before 9/11! why would a company like SOM design the twin towers when it was still standing? & why would a world renouned accademic put his credentials on line if this was not a fact?

I am an architect with practice knowledge in structure. I humbly say it is an insult to my profession when we have witnessed that when the towers were collapsing and that not one set of columns or cores resisted the fall and allow the tower to fall in large segments instead of absolute uniform implosion! it is a clear sign of detonation.

btw, plz realize countless countless countless of innocent lives has been lost and others are suffering miserably right at this moment becuase of this fake war on terror and to provide contracts to private military companies owned by the influential few. is this the best the free world has to offer? is this what the leader of the free world america has to offer. Then we don’t have a chance. Looks like the nazi or the soviets were a better deal … think about it america. if you don’t stand up to the truth, it will be time when power will shift to a more just nation.

]]> by: CrazedLeper http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2007/02/28/the-september-11-2001-attacks/#comment-32656 Tue, 20 May 2008 22:31:29 +0000 http://joecrubaugh.com/blog/2007/02/28/the-september-11-2001-attacks/#comment-32656 This is good, but I'm going to have to disagree with one point "Put two and two together, and the picture that most clearly takes shape is an inside job that exploited a genuine terrorist plot" A closer examination of some of video and circumstantial evidence suggests that we're further from knowing the *whole* truth about 9/11 than all but the most adventurous conspiracist (which I believe I may be approaching) would dare theorize. I admit it is treading in dangerous waters but I have seen compelling evidence suggesting considerable fakery in the video that was presented as news on the most corrupt day in US history. For starters, the total penetration of a jet into the side of the building is unlikely. It is more likely that the tail (with a skin as thick as a beer can) would have broken off rather than penetrate steel, concrete and glass like a knife through butter. Total penetration of the towers is as plausible as the total destruction of the towers due to an airplane impact (really, all the way to the ground level and sub basements?). Other serious problems and discrepancies in the videos exist. I do not believe that any "hijackers" were used at all. The hedonistic behavior of the implicated men that has been described suggests rather strongly that they were not they type to go on a suicide mission. Further, many of the "hijackers" have since been confirmed to be alive and well in Pakistan. Human pilots would have introduced an element of unpredictability. There is no knowing what they would *actually* do or (being so poorly trained) if they would screw up. No chances could be taken; radio controlled drones were the most likely vehicle--assuming planes were actually used at all. Furthermore, I don't believe there is any Al Qaeda anymore. Bin Laden was a Bush family friend and it is so phenomenally unlikely that he was getting away with a spectacular terrorist attack at the same time his family was visiting the white house that I am unwilling to consider even the remote possibility that it actually occurred. I find it more likely that "Al Qaeda" is a pretext and a euphemism for "whoever the MilitAry indusTRIal compleX wants to kill next". How else could they know that the "war on terror" will last 100 years? Clearly, they plan to kill a lot of people. I would probably take 100 years to whittle down the population of the world to 50 million Aryans, wouldn't it? Check out the www.tincapjournal.blogspot.com for a look at the events that occurred at the Pentagon that day and what the future may hold. This is good, but I’m going to have to disagree with one point

“Put two and two together, and the picture that most clearly takes shape is an inside job that exploited a genuine terrorist plot”

A closer examination of some of video and circumstantial evidence suggests that we’re further from knowing the *whole* truth about 9/11 than all but the most adventurous conspiracist (which I believe I may be approaching) would dare theorize. I admit it is treading in dangerous waters but I have seen compelling evidence suggesting considerable fakery in the video that was presented as news on the most corrupt day in US history.

For starters, the total penetration of a jet into the side of the building is unlikely. It is more likely that the tail (with a skin as thick as a beer can) would have broken off rather than penetrate steel, concrete and glass like a knife through butter. Total penetration of the towers is as plausible as the total destruction of the towers due to an airplane impact (really, all the way to the ground level and sub basements?). Other serious problems and discrepancies in the videos exist.

I do not believe that any “hijackers” were used at all. The hedonistic behavior of the implicated men that has been described suggests rather strongly that they were not they type to go on a suicide mission. Further, many of the “hijackers” have since been confirmed to be alive and well in Pakistan.

Human pilots would have introduced an element of unpredictability. There is no knowing what they would *actually* do or (being so poorly trained) if they would screw up. No chances could be taken; radio controlled drones were the most likely vehicle–assuming planes were actually used at all.

Furthermore, I don’t believe there is any Al Qaeda anymore. Bin Laden was a Bush family friend and it is so phenomenally unlikely that he was getting away with a spectacular terrorist attack at the same time his family was visiting the white house that I am unwilling to consider even the remote possibility that it actually occurred.

I find it more likely that “Al Qaeda” is a pretext and a euphemism for “whoever the MilitAry indusTRIal compleX wants to kill next”. How else could they know that the “war on terror” will last 100 years? Clearly, they plan to kill a lot of people. I would probably take 100 years to whittle down the population of the world to 50 million Aryans, wouldn’t it?

Check out the www.tincapjournal.blogspot.com for a look at the events that occurred at the Pentagon that day and what the future may hold.

]]>