Inching Closer to Hell
January of 2007 was the hottest January ever recorded since land stations and ships began logging temperatures worldwide in the mid 1800s (when thermometers came into widespread vogue.)
We’ve seen the huge difference a one degree change makes, and now, the U.S. National Climatic Data Center in Asheville, North Carolina, reports that in January, the world’s land areas were a whopping 3.4°F warmer than normal. This breaks the old 2002 record by 0.81°F. It also stands as the biggest temperature jump the world has seen in 10 years.
Although the United States was about normal, Siberia was 9°F above normal, Eastern Europe was 8°F above, and Canada more than 5°F above normal.
Warmer temperatures farther north with less change near the equator fits the global warming model, according to the The Fourth Assessment Report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The Fourth Assessment Report, an authoritative report produced by over 600 scientists from 40 countries and reviewed by over 620 experts, was issued earlier this month.
In addition to global warming, a weakening El Nino — a warming of the central Pacific Ocean that tends to cause changes in weather across the globe — was also a factor, but scientists agree it was not a very big factor.
Read More: global warming, climate change, environment, IPCC
Related Articles
February 17th, 2007 at 8:30 am
Joe, I don’t see a contact link for you directly.
Just wondering if you are going to include 9/11 as a False-Flag possibility in your False-Flag series, which looks pretty damn good, so far, BTW.
February 17th, 2007 at 10:08 am
reprehensor: I’ve pretty much ordered the false flag posts by year, from most ancient to most recent…and I think you and everybody else, by now, can just smell 9/11 coming, right? ;-) I’m looking at the Gulf of Tonkin right now for #2, and then I’m going to wade into 9/11 territory. There are sooooo many recent probable false flags, with the London 7/7 bombings a major example, obviously the guys thought they were part of a drill and didn’t know the bombs were real….but back to 9/11, I am really having to parse through a lot of information (plus, now I’ve got to go through your site…which looks awesome, but a daunting mountain of great info…) to boil it down to a very long article with the facts that hit me in the stomach the hardest, and I’m going to try to stay objective and not say that Cheney Was The Point Man; I’ll let everybody read the facts and come to that conclusion on their own ;-)
Thanks for dropping in!
P.S. I’ve been reluctant to post any kind of contact info to prevent adding yet ANOTHER email account to my life where I have to daily wade through a mountain of spam. Any suggestions?
February 17th, 2007 at 12:14 pm
Well, despite the fact that google trolls their email for “keywords” (yeah right) I’ve found it relatively spam free. One trick is to list your email on your page as a dead link, i.e. joe (at) blahmail.com that way, spambots don’t see it.
Post it as a gif and that’s even better.
For your 9/11 false flag research, I highly recommend these two articles by Nafeez Mossadeq Ahmed;
“Subverting Terrorism”
http://www.gnn.tv/blogs/12624/
Download “Subverting Terrorism” here;
http://perdana4peace.org/forum_pdf/Nafeez%20-%20Terrorism.pdf
and
“The Continuity of Western-Al-Qaeda Relations in the Post-Cold War Period”
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/reprehensor/20
The link to the download at Cynthia McKinney’s site is dead, try this one, that’s where I got “The Continuity” from;
“THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT - ONE YEAR LATER - A CITIZENS’ RESPONSE: DID THE COMMISSION GET IT RIGHT?”
http://www.911podcasts.com/files/documents/did-they-get-it-right.zip
I also recommend Webster G. Tarpley’s “9/11: Synthetic Terrorism” if you haven’t read it.
Finally, I ask you to prioritize this project, as I fear we are due for a new one;
“Bushco is Looking for a Pretext to Bomb Iran”
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=214861&mesg_id=214861
February 17th, 2007 at 1:27 pm
Thanks for all the info, and links. I agree about bombing Iran. Just as the Iraq invasion was on the calendar long before 9/11, Iran has been in the plans for quite some time. Now that the Dems have come out so strongly against it (if you can call a non-binding resolution strong…), especially since they’ve made comments about the authority they gave Bush to invade Iraq NOT extending to Iran, I fear it’s gonna take a false flag to drop the mini-nukes, and with all the carriers and ships sunning and funning around Iran’s coast lately, there’s plenty of targets. But a ship may not be enough; it may take sacrificing a U.S. city to get the dumb masses behind the justification for nuking Tehran. I’m actually surprised it’s taking them this long to do it…I thought it would have happened last fall before the election.
February 17th, 2007 at 5:02 pm
Are we going to let a little destruction of the planet, a few thousand killed, and untold thousands maimed get in the way of corporate profits? If we stopped wars and started cleaning up the planet, the profits might drop from 15% and 20% and higher to an unthinkable 6% to 9% a year. What would happen to all those poor souls who would have to suffer by having their year end bonuses cut to a measly million or two. You know those millions don’t go as far as you think.